data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa019/fa0192026c706faf9f6dfb08edeabdc145281513" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be45/3be45a14a4272fa2100250eec112d1827d1ff1f4" alt="0199b// Angularity, Parallelism or Perpendicularity with Implied Flatness"
0199b// Angularity, Parallelism or Perpendicularity with Implied Flatness
We to knowing that, orientation control ( Angularity, Perpendicularity and Parallelism) always come with implied flatness. We will...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/528cd/528cd75426fe6893527fc13af530539b998f5612" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/298c5/298c5df79c7e0951ab66688e8499f937c3b7b005" alt="0080// What is the difference between A parallel to B and B parallel to A ?"
0080// What is the difference between A parallel to B and B parallel to A ?
In math, you can confidently say that, A parallel to B same as B parallel to A. However, in GD&T perspective, this is not the case. Why?